Myers v. Cocheco Woolen Mfg. Co.

First Circuit

Myers v. Cocheco Woolen Mfg. Co.

94 F.2d 590, 2 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 783, 1938 U.S. App. LEXIS 4474

CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit

DecidedFebruary 9, 1938

DocketNo. 3264

StatusPublished

This text of 94 F.2d 590 (Myers v. Cocheco Woolen Mfg. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Myers v. Cocheco Woolen Mfg. Co., 94 F.2d 590, 2 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 783, 1938 U.S. App. LEXIS 4474 (1st Cir. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a final decree of the District Court for New Hampshire ordering a permanent injunction enjoining the defendants, A. Howard Myers, individually and as representative of the National Labor Relations Board, J. Warren Madden and Edwin S. Smith, individually and as members of said Board, and their successors in office, their agents, representatives, and employees, and Horace J. Brouilette from further prosecuting their complaint in the National Labor Relations Board against the Cocheco Woolen Manufacturing Company, etc., the same having been entered in a suit in equity filed by the Cocheco Woolen Manufacturing Company and the Employees’ Protective Association, both of Rochester, N. H., praying for said injunction.

In view of the recent decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States (Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp., Ltd., 58 S.Ct. 459, 82 L.Ed. -, and Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co. v. Schauffler, 58 S.Ct. 466, 82 L.Ed. -, decided January 31, 1938), the decree appealed from is vacated and the case is remanded to the District Court with directions to dismiss the suit and dissolve the injunction.

The decree of the District Court is vacated and the case is remanded to that court with directions to dismiss the suit and dissolve the injunction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a final decree of the District Court for New Hampshire ordering a permanent injunction enjoining the defendants, A. Howard Myers, individually and as representative of the National Labor Relations Board, J. Warren Madden and Edwin S. Smith, individually and as members of said Board, and their successors in office, their agents, representatives, and employees, and Horace J. Brouilette from further prosecuting their complaint in the National Labor Relations Board against the Cocheco Woolen Manufacturing Company, etc., the same having been entered in a suit in equity filed by the Cocheco Woolen Manufacturing Company and the Employees’ Protective Association, both of Rochester, N. H., praying for said injunction.

In view of the recent decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States (Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp., Ltd., 58 S.Ct. 459, 82 L.Ed. -, and Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co. v. Schauffler, 58 S.Ct. 466, 82 L.Ed. -, decided January 31, 1938), the decree appealed from is vacated and the case is remanded to the District Court with directions to dismiss the suit and dissolve the injunction.

The decree of the District Court is vacated and the case is remanded to that court with directions to dismiss the suit and dissolve the injunction.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

94 F.2d 590, 2 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 783, 1938 U.S. App. LEXIS 4474, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/myers-v-cocheco-woolen-mfg-co-ca1-1938.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack