Myers v. Chester Union Free School District

300 A.D.2d 287, 750 N.Y.S.2d 873
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 2, 2002
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 300 A.D.2d 287 (Myers v. Chester Union Free School District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Myers v. Chester Union Free School District, 300 A.D.2d 287, 750 N.Y.S.2d 873 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for defamation, the defendant Chester Union Free School District appeals, as limited by its brief, from stated portions of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Paño Z. Patsalos, J.H.O.), dated September 25, 2001, which, after a nonjury trial, inter alia, directed it to expunge a certain letter from the plaintiff’s personnel file.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The plaintiff is a tenured teacher with the appellant school district. She contends that a letter was placed in her personnel file critical of various aspects of her conduct and job performance without affording her the requisite due process protections provided by statute (see Civil Service Law § 75; Education Law § 3020-a). In the judgment appealed from, the Supreme Court, inter alia, ordered the letter expunged from her personnel file. We affirm.

Contrary to the appellant’s contention, the letter cannot be properly characterized as a Holt letter (see Holt v Board of Educ. of Webutuck Cent. School Dist., 52 NY2d 625; Matter of Civil Serv. Empls. Assn. v Southold Union Free School Dist., [288]*288204 AD2d 445). Thus, the Supreme Court properly ordered the letter expunged from the plaintiffs personnel file (see Matter of Civil Serv. Empls. Assn. v Southold Union Free School Dist., supra).

The appellant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or do not warrant reversal. Ritter, J.P., Friedmann, H. Miller and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Weinberger v. Elmsford Union Free Sch. Dist.
121 A.D.3d 1122 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
D'Angelo v. Scopetta
81 A.D.3d 820 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Gutman v. Board of Education
18 Misc. 3d 609 (New York Supreme Court, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
300 A.D.2d 287, 750 N.Y.S.2d 873, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/myers-v-chester-union-free-school-district-nyappdiv-2002.