Myers v. Boston & Maine Railroad

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Myers v. Boston & Maine Railroad

95 N.E. 76, 209 Mass. 55, 1911 Mass. LEXIS 899

CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

DecidedMay 18, 1911

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 95 N.E. 76 (Myers v. Boston & Maine Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Myers v. Boston & Maine Railroad, 95 N.E. 76, 209 Mass. 55, 1911 Mass. LEXIS 899 (Mass. 1911).

Pincite

Opinion

Hammond, J.

These are two actions of tort, the first being for personal injuries sustained, by a minor, and the second by his father for loss of services of the minor. The actions were tried together.

There is no evidence that the minor was invited into the car by any one representing or having the right to act for the defendant ; and he was therefore at the most a mere licensee. The measure of the defendant’s duty was to refrain from wanton or reckless conduct tending to injure him. There was no evidence of such conduct.

The order directing verdicts for the defendant was correct. In each case the entry must be

Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI