Myers v. Boston & Maine Railroad
Opinion
These are two actions of tort, the first being for personal injuries sustained, by a minor, and the second by his father for loss of services of the minor. The actions were tried together.
There is no evidence that the minor was invited into the car by any one representing or having the right to act for the defendant ; and he was therefore at the most a mere licensee. The measure of the defendant’s duty was to refrain from wanton or reckless conduct tending to injure him. There was no evidence of such conduct.
The order directing verdicts for the defendant was correct. In each case the entry must be
Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
95 N.E. 76 (Myers v. Boston & Maine Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.