Myers v. Bentz

17 A. 899, 127 Pa. 222, 1889 Pa. LEXIS 1104
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJune 7, 1889
DocketNo. 9
StatusPublished

This text of 17 A. 899 (Myers v. Bentz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Myers v. Bentz, 17 A. 899, 127 Pa. 222, 1889 Pa. LEXIS 1104 (Pa. 1889).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

In view of the facts presented in the case stated, we are of opinion that the deed of Louisa and Catharine Ahl, surviving devisees of their mother Mary Ahl, to Ellen G. Bentz, the plaintiff below, for the real estate in question, vested in the latter a good title thereto in fee simple, and that the deed tendered by her to defendant below is sufficient to vest in him a good title in fee simple to same real estate. It therefore follows that the learned judge of the Common Pleas was right in entering judgment on the ease stated in favor of the plaintiff below. The assignment of error is not sustained.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
17 A. 899, 127 Pa. 222, 1889 Pa. LEXIS 1104, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/myers-v-bentz-pa-1889.