Myers-Skinner v. City of New York
This text of 91 A.D.3d 527 (Myers-Skinner v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[528]*528Under the terms of the applicable lease, lessee ExxonMobil owed lessor 4201 Webster no duty to maintain the sidewalk where plaintiff fell (cf. Collado v Cruz, 81 AD3d 542 [2011]), and the record refutes 4201 Webster’s argument that it was physically excluded from the property. The sidewalk where plaintiff fell was not under ExxonMobil’s control. Any lease obligation to maintain it was not in effect insofar as the parties were still in the preliminary period.
We have considered the remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur — Andrias, J.E, Sweeny, Moskowitz, Renwick and Freedman, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
91 A.D.3d 527, 936 N.Y.2d 545, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/myers-skinner-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-2012.