Myer v. First National Bank

Indiana Court of Appeals

Myer v. First National Bank

148 N.E. 927, 83 Ind. App. 739, 1925 Ind. App. LEXIS 150

Indiana Court of Appeals·Decided June 24, 1925·No. No. 12,320.·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause was argued orally, and, upon such argument, the counsel for appellant conceded that the controlling question in this case was the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain certain specified special findings, and that if the evidence was sufficient, this cause must be affirmed. The entire evidence has been carefully read; we hold it sufficient to sustain the finding questioned.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This cause was argued orally, and, upon such argument, the counsel for appellant conceded that the controlling question in this case was the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain certain specified special findings, and that if the evidence was sufficient, this cause must be affirmed. The entire evidence has been carefully read; we hold it sufficient to sustain the finding questioned.

Affirmed.

Myer v. First National Bank, 148 N.E. 927, 83 Ind. App. 739, 1925 Ind. App. LEXIS 150 (Ind. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

148 N.E. 927 (Myer v. First National Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.