My Pad Properties LLC v. State Farm Lloyds

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION MY PAD PROPERTIES LLC, § § Plaintiff, § § V. § CIVIL ACTION NO. SA-24-CA-00512-FB § STATE FARM LLOYDS, § § Defendant. § ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge, filed in the above-captioned cause on March 2, 2026. (ECF No. 37). To date, no objections to the Report and Recommendation have been received.1 Because no party has objected to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, the Court need not conduct a de novo review. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) ("A judge of the court shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings and recommendations to which objection is made."). The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and finds its reasoning to be neither clearly erroneous nor contrary to law. United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 918 (1989). IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 37) is ACCEPTED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) such that: • Defendant State Farm Lloyds’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 28) is GRANTED; and • Plaintiff My Pad Properties LLC’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (ECF No. 27) is be DISMISSED AS MOOT. IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that remaining motions pending with the Court, if any, are Dismissed as Moot and this case is CLOSED. It is so ORDERED. SIGNED this 23rd day of March, 2026. wee . —fret C D BIERY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE