My Daily Choice, Inc. v. Jackson

CourtDistrict Court, D. Nevada
DecidedJuly 26, 2021
Docket2:20-cv-02237
StatusUnknown

This text of My Daily Choice, Inc. v. Jackson (My Daily Choice, Inc. v. Jackson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
My Daily Choice, Inc. v. Jackson, (D. Nev. 2021).

Opinion

1 ERIKA PIKE TURNER 2 Nevada Bar No. 6454 Email: eturner@gtg.legal 3 JARED M. SECHRIST Nevada Bar No. 10439 4 Email: jsechrist@gtg.legal 7251 Amigo Street, Suite 210 5 Las Vegas, Nevada 89119 Tel: (725) 777-3000 6 Fax: (725) 777-3112

7 Attorneys for Plaintiff, My Daily Choice, Inc.

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 10 MY DAILY CHOICE, INC., a Nevada Case No. 2:20-CV-02237-JAD-NJK corporation; 11 Plaintiff,

12 v. STIPULATED PROTECTIVE 13 ORDER ERIN JACKSON, an individual; and DOES 1 14 through 20, and ROE ENTITIES 1-20, inclusive,

15 Defendants.

16 17 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 18 Disclosure and discovery activity in this action are likely to involve production of 19 confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public 20 disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. 21 Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the court to enter the following Stipulated 22 Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on 23 all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure 24 and use extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment 25 under the applicable legal principles. The parties further acknowledge, as set forth in Section 12.3, 26 below, that this Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to file confidential information 27 under seal; Local Rule IA 10-5 sets forth the procedures that must be followed and the standards 28 that will be applied when a party seeks permission from the court to file material under seal. 1 2 2.1 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation of 3 information or items under this Order. 4 2.2 “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of how it is 5 generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under Federal Rule 6 of Civil Procedure 26(c). 7 2.3 Counsel (without qualifier): Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel (as 8 well as their support staff). 9 2.4 Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or items that it 10 produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY 11 CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY”. 12 2.5 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of the 13 medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things, 14 testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or generated in disclosures or 15 responses to discovery in this matter. 16 2.6 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter pertinent to 17 the litigation who (1) has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an expert witness or 18 as a consultant in this action, (2) is not a past or current employee of a Party or of a Party’s 19 competitor, and (3) at the time of retention, is not anticipated to become an employee of a Party or 20 of a Party’s competitor. 21 2.7 “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” Information or 22 Items: extremely sensitive “Confidential Information or Items,” disclosure of which to another 23 Party or Non-Party would create a substantial risk of serious harm that could not be avoided by 24 less restrictive means. 25 2.8 House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a party to this action. House 26 Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside counsel. 27 2.9 Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal 28 entity not named as a Party to this action. 1 2 action but are retained to represent or advise a party to this action and have appeared in this action 3 on behalf of that party or are affiliated with a law firm which has appeared on behalf of that party. 4 2.11 Party: any party to this action, including all of its officers, directors, employees, 5 consultants, retained experts, and Outside Counsel of Record (and their support staffs). 6 2.12 Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or Discovery 7 Material in this action. 8 2.13 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support services 9 (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or demonstrations, and 10 organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) and their employees and 11 subcontractors. 12 2.14 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is designated as 13 “CONFIDENTIAL,” or as “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” 14 2.15 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material from a 15 Producing Party. 16 2.16 Related Case: related cases are My Daily Choice, Inc. v. Butler, et al. Case No. 17 2:20-cv-02178-JAD-NJK; My Daily Choice, Inc. v. Donnell, Case No. 2:20-cv-02225-JAD-NJK; 18 My Daily Choice, Inc. v. Lituski, Case No. 2:20-cv-02232-JAD-NJK; and My Daily Choice, Inc. 19 v. Lambert, Case No. 2:20-cv-02228-JAD-NJK. No other cases shall be considered a Related Case 20 to this matter absent the written approval of all Parties to this matter. 21 3. SCOPE 22 The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only Protected Material 23 (as defined above), but also (1) any Confidential Information copied or extracted from Protected 24 Material; (2) all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any 25 testimony, conversations, or presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected 26 Material. However, the protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order do not cover the 27 following information: (a) any information that is in the public domain at the time of disclosure to 28 a Receiving Party or becomes part of the public domain after its disclosure to a Receiving Party as 1 2 record through trial or otherwise; and (b) any information known to the Receiving Party prior to 3 the disclosure or obtained by the Receiving Party after the disclosure from a source who obtained 4 the information lawfully and under no obligation of confidentiality to the Designating Party. Any 5 use of Protected Material at trial shall be governed by a separate agreement or order. 6 4. DURATION 7 Even after final disposition of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations imposed by this 8 Order shall remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees otherwise in writing or a court order 9 otherwise directs. Final disposition shall be deemed to be the later of (1) dismissal of all claims 10 and defenses in this action, with or without prejudice; and (2) final judgment herein after the 11 completion and exhaustion of all appeals, rehearings, remands, trials, or reviews of this action, 12 including the time limits for filing any motions or applications for extension of time pursuant to 13 applicable law. 14 5. DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL 15 5.1 Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection. Each Party 16 or Non-Party that designates information or items for protection under this Order must take care 17 to limit any such designation to specific material that qualifies under the appropriate standards. To 18 the extent it is practical to do so, the Designating Party must designate for protection only those 19 parts of material, documents, items, or oral or written communications that qualify – so that other 20 portions of the material, documents, items, or communications for which protection is not 21 warranted are not swept unjustifiably within the ambit of this Order. 22 Mass, indiscriminate, or routinized designations are prohibited.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu
447 F.3d 1172 (Ninth Circuit, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
My Daily Choice, Inc. v. Jackson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/my-daily-choice-inc-v-jackson-nvd-2021.