My Carpet, Inc. v. Bruce Supply Corp.

8 A.D.3d 248, 777 N.Y.S.2d 308, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7535
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 1, 2004·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for loss of property, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Golar, J), dated March 28, 2003, which granted the defendant’s motion to strike the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3126 (3).

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff’s continued failure to comply with discovery requests, and a so-ordered stipulation to satisfy those requests, was willful, contumacious, and in bad faith (see Beneficial Mtge. Corp. v Lawrence, 5 AD3d 339 [2004]). Therefore, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in striking the plaintiffs complaint as a sanction pursuant to CPLR 3126 (3) (see Yona v Beth Israel Med. Ctr., 285 AD2d 460, 461 [2001]). Ritter, J.P., S. Miller, Townes, Crane and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

My Carpet, Inc. v. Bruce Supply Corp., 8 A.D.3d 248, 777 N.Y.S.2d 308, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7535 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

8 A.D.3d 248 (My Carpet, Inc. v. Bruce Supply Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Field v. Bao
140 A.D.3d 921 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Morgenstern v. Jeffsam Corp.
78 A.D.3d 913 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Umar v. Ohrnberger
72 A.D.3d 1066 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Suazo-Alvarez v. Nordlaw, LLC
48 A.D.3d 670 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
McArthur v. New York City Housing Authority
48 A.D.3d 431 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)