M'wanza v. Byrna
This text of M'wanza v. Byrna (M'wanza v. Byrna) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1 2
3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA
5 * * *
6 TACUMA J. M’WANZA, Case No. 3:16-cv-00590-MMD-WGC
7 Plaintiff, ORDER v. 8 Q. BYRNA et al., 9 Defendants. 10 11 This action is a pro se civil rights complaint filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 by a 12 former state prisoner, who appears to be incarcerated again. (ECF Nos. 1-1, 11, 12.) On 13 June 9, 2020, the Ninth Circuit vacated the Court’s order denying Plaintiff’s motion for 14 reconsideration seeking to reopen his case. (ECF No. 18.) The Ninth Circuit’s mandate 15 now having issued (ECF No. 19), the Court vacates the portion of its prior order denying 16 Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration (ECF No. 13 at 1-2). Per the Ninth Circuit’s order 17 (ECF No. 18 at 2), the Court will evaluate Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration (ECF No. 18 12) using the four-factor test for excusable neglect outlined in Pioneer Investment 19 Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. Partnership, 507 U.S. 380, 395 (1993) in a 20 separate, forthcoming order. 21 DATED THIS 2nd day of July 2020.
23 MIRANDA M. DU 24 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 25 26 27
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
M'wanza v. Byrna, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mwanza-v-byrna-nvd-2020.