Mwabira-Simera v. Edmondson

485 F. App'x 631
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 15, 2012·No. No. 12-1829·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Samuel H. Mwabira-Simera seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motions to quash subpoenas and for court appointed counsel. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Mwabira-Simera seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We deny Mwabira-Simera’s motion for oral argument and grant Supervalu, Inc.’s motion to dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mwabira-Simera v. Edmondson, 485 F. App'x 631 (4th Cir. 2012).

485 F. App'x 631 (Mwabira-Simera v. Edmondson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related