M.W. v. A.E., D.E., and Franklin County Department of Human Resources

CourtCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama
DecidedJuly 11, 2025
DocketCL-2024-0938
StatusPublished

This text of M.W. v. A.E., D.E., and Franklin County Department of Human Resources (M.W. v. A.E., D.E., and Franklin County Department of Human Resources) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
M.W. v. A.E., D.E., and Franklin County Department of Human Resources, (Ala. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

Rel: July 11, 2025

Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the advance sheets of Southern Reporter. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Alabama Appellate Courts, 300 Dexter Avenue, Montgomery, Alabama 36104-3741 ((334) 229-0650), of any typographical or other errors, in order that corrections may be made before the opinion is published in Southern Reporter.

ALABAMA COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS SPECIAL TERM, 2025 _________________________

CL-2024-0938 _________________________

M.W.

v.

A.E., D.E., and Franklin County Department of Human Resources

_________________________

CL-2024-0939 _________________________

C.M.

A.E., D.E., and Franklin County Department of Human Resources

Appeals from Franklin Juvenile Court (JU-22-177.04) CL-2024-0938 and CL-2024-0939

HANSON, Judge.

CL-2024-0938 -- AFFIRMED BY UNPUBLISHED MEMORANDUM.

CL-2024-0939 -- AFFIRMED BY UNPUBLISHED MEMORANDUM.

Fridy and Bowden, JJ., concur.

Edwards, J., concurs in the result, without opinion.

Moore, P.J., dissents, with opinion.

2 CL-2024-0938 and CL-2024-0939

MOORE, Presiding Judge, dissenting.

I respectfully dissent. I agree that the Franklin Juvenile Court

("the juvenile court") erred in finding that M.W. ("the father") had an

ongoing substance-abuse problem and that C.M. ("the mother") had an

ongoing mental-health problem that impaired their ability to care for

M.K.W. ("the child"). I disagree, however, that the error was harmless

because I cannot conclude that the juvenile court would have terminated

the parental rights of the father and the mother absent those erroneous

findings. I believe that this court should reverse the judgment and

remand the case for the juvenile court to reconsider whether it should

terminate the mother's and the father's parental rights, without taking

into account its erroneous findings, as we did in B.T. v. Jefferson County

Department of Human Resources, [Ms. CL-2023-0944, Aug. 30, 2024] ___

So. 3d ___ (Ala. Civ. App. 2024).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
M.W. v. A.E., D.E., and Franklin County Department of Human Resources, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mw-v-ae-de-and-franklin-county-department-of-human-resources-alacivapp-2025.