M'Veaugh v. Goods

1 Dall. 62
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided September 15, 1781·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

But,

By the Court

:——It nearly concerns the administration of justice, that witnesses should be free from every kind of biass. It is true, that Scull has no positive promise of a reward; but, we think, the expectation which he acknowledges, in case the goods shall be condemned, must create such an influence in his mind, as renders it improper for him to give testimony on this occasion.

Lewis offered in evidence a pass from a justice of New Jersey, permitting the goods in question to be conveyed through that State.

Sergeant objected, that the pass of a justice of New Jersey, could not be given in evidence to defeat an Act of the Legislature of Pennsylvania.

To this Lewis replied, that it was offered merely to obviate any imputation of fraud in concealing it.

But, By the Court it was declared, that the pass was admissible as evidence.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

M'Veaugh v. Goods, 1 Dall. 62 (Pa. 1781).

1 Dall. 62 (M'Veaugh v. Goods) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kelley v. Lawrence Public Schools
D. Massachusetts, 2018
Lewis v. Post
1 Ala. 65 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1840)
Commercial Bank v. Hughes
17 Wend. 94 (New York Supreme Court, 1837)
Raymond v. Simonson
4 Blackf. 77 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1835)
Long v. Bailie
4 Serg. & Rawle 222 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1818)