Muzroll v. Wilson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Muzroll v. Wilson

173 A.D.2d 447, 570 N.Y.S.2d 996, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7405

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 6, 1991

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 173 A.D.2d 447 (Muzroll v. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Muzroll v. Wilson, 173 A.D.2d 447, 570 N.Y.S.2d 996, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7405 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Lama, J.), entered October 4, 1989, which granted the plaintiffs’ motion to direct the defendant’s insurer to comply with an "amended infant’s compromise order” dated July 6, 1987.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant never moved to vacate, amend, or modify the "amended infant’s compromise order” (see, CPLR 5015). He first raised an objection to the terms of that order in opposition to the plaintiff’s motion to compel his compliance with the order, approximately two years after it was issued. As such, the defendant has waived any objection he may have had to the amended order (see, Matter of MVAIC v Marrero, 17 NY2d 342).

We have considered the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Kunzeman and Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Lama, J.), entered October 4, 1989, which granted the plaintiffs’ motion to direct the defendant’s insurer to comply with an "amended infant’s compromise order” dated July 6, 1987.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant never moved to vacate, amend, or modify the "amended infant’s compromise order” (see, CPLR 5015). He first raised an objection to the terms of that order in opposition to the plaintiff’s motion to compel his compliance with the order, approximately two years after it was issued. As such, the defendant has waived any objection he may have had to the amended order (see, Matter of MVAIC v Marrero, 17 NY2d 342).

We have considered the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Kunzeman and Miller, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

173 A.D.2d 447, 570 N.Y.S.2d 996, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7405, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/muzroll-v-wilson-nyappdiv-1991.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack