Muzio v. Krauzer
300 A.2d 150, 62 N.J. 243, 1973 N.J. LEXIS 236
This text of 300 A.2d 150 (Muzio v. Krauzer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Muzio v. Krauzer, 300 A.2d 150, 62 N.J. 243, 1973 N.J. LEXIS 236 (N.J. 1973).
Opinion
The judgment of the Appellate Division, 122 N. J. Super. 221, is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in its per curiam opinion.
For affirmance — Chief Justice Weintraub, Justice Hall, and Judges Contord and Sullivan — 4.
For reversal — Justices Jacobs and Mountain — 2.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services
9 A.3d 882 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2010)
Liptak v. Frank
502 A.2d 1147 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1985)
Mirza v. Filmore Corp.
456 A.2d 518 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1983)
Cogliati v. Ecco High Frequency Corp.
439 A.2d 91 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1981)
Yanhko v. Fane
362 A.2d 1 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1976)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
300 A.2d 150, 62 N.J. 243, 1973 N.J. LEXIS 236, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/muzio-v-krauzer-nj-1973.