Muzio v. Krauzer
300 A.2d 150, 62 N.J. 243, 1973 N.J. LEXIS 236
Opinion
The judgment of the Appellate Division, 122 N. J. Super. 221, is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in its per curiam opinion.
For affirmance — Chief Justice Weintraub, Justice Hall, and Judges Contord and Sullivan — 4.
For reversal — Justices Jacobs and Mountain — 2.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Muzio v. Krauzer, 300 A.2d 150, 62 N.J. 243, 1973 N.J. LEXIS 236 (N.J. 1973).
300 A.2d 150 (Muzio v. Krauzer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services
9 A.3d 882 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2010)
Liptak v. Frank
502 A.2d 1147 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1985)
Mirza v. Filmore Corp.
456 A.2d 518 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1983)
Cogliati v. Ecco High Frequency Corp.
439 A.2d 91 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1981)
Yanhko v. Fane
362 A.2d 1 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1976)