Muzik v. Erie Railroad
92 A. 1087, 86 N.J.L. 695, 1914 N.J. LEXIS 320
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Voorhees in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chibe Justice, Garrison, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Bogert, Terhune, Heppenheimer, Williams, JJ. 12.
For reversal — Hone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Muzik v. Erie Railroad, 92 A. 1087, 86 N.J.L. 695, 1914 N.J. LEXIS 320 (N.J. 1914).
92 A. 1087 (Muzik v. Erie Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
MacKo v. Herbert Hinchman & Son
94 A.2d 690 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1953)
Bohrman v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co.
93 A.2d 190 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1952)