Muzen v. Keller

21 F. App'x 681
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedOctober 24, 2001
DocketNo. 01-15331; D.C. No. CV-00-1299-RLH(LRL)
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 21 F. App'x 681 (Muzen v. Keller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Muzen v. Keller, 21 F. App'x 681 (9th Cir. 2001).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM2

Amir Muzen, a Nevada state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court’s dismissal, under 42 U.S.C. § 1915A, of Muzen’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging prison officials violated his Eighth Amendment rights when they allowed an HIV-infected inmate to pour his own drinks from a pitcher used by all inmates, including Muzen. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s dismissal, see Resnick v. Hayes, 213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th Cir.2000), and we affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Muzen’s complaint, because Muzen did not demonstrate that he suffered from a serious medical need or that prison officials [682]*682knew of and disregarded any excessive risk. See Doty v. County of Lassen, 37 F.3d 540, 546 (9th Cir.1994); Farmer v. Brennan, 511 U.S. 825, 837, 114 S.Ct. 1970, 128 L.Ed.2d 811 (1994).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
21 F. App'x 681, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/muzen-v-keller-ca9-2001.