Mutual Sav. Life Ins. Co. v. Osborne
This text of 7 So. 2d 319 (Mutual Sav. Life Ins. Co. v. Osborne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The judgment of the Court of Appeals dismissing the appeal cannot be sustained. It was taken within the time provided and allowed by the statute so far as appears from the record. It is true the notice or citation was not served for several months afterwards, but this irregularity affected only the question as to when the appeal should stand for trial, and not the jurisdictional validity of the appeal itself, which became complete when it was prayed for and the requisite security given. Willingham v. Harrell, 34 Ala. 680; Moore v. Spier, 80 Ala. 129; Kimbrell v. Rogers, 90 Ala. 339, 7 So. 241.
It may be the appellee had his remedy for this delay by requesting a judgment of affirmance on production of the proper certificate from the court below; but this he did not do.
In the cases cited in the opinion of the Court of Appeals it appears that there was no service of notice or citation of appeal, not a belated service.
It therefore follows that the petition for writ of certiorari is awarded, and the cause reversed and remanded to the Court of Appeals for consideration on the merits.
Writ awarded; reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
7 So. 2d 319, 242 Ala. 19, 1941 Ala. LEXIS 285, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mutual-sav-life-ins-co-v-osborne-ala-1941.