Mutual Reserve Life Insurance v. Birch
This text of 200 U.S. 612 (Mutual Reserve Life Insurance v. Birch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In error to the Supreme Court of the State o'f New York.
Judgment affirmed with ten per cent damages, in addition to interest-and costs. Mutual Reserve Fund Life Association v. Phelps, 190 U. S. 147; Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Spratley, 172 U. S. 602; Egan v. Hart, 165 U. S. 188; Richardson v. L. & N. Railroad Company, 169 U. S. 128; Young v. Valentine, 177 N. Y. 347; Woodward v. Mutual Reserve Life Insurance Company, 178 N. Y. 485; Birch v. Mutual Reserve Life Insurance Company, 181 N. Y. 583; S. C., 91 App. Div. 384.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
200 U.S. 612, 26 S. Ct. 752, 50 L. Ed. 620, 1905 U.S. LEXIS 971, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mutual-reserve-life-insurance-v-birch-scotus-1905.