Mutual Profit Realty Co. v. Nelson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Mutual Profit Realty Co. v. Nelson

172 A.D. 893, 156 N.Y.S. 1136

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 15, 1915

StatusPublished

This text of 172 A.D. 893 (Mutual Profit Realty Co. v. Nelson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mutual Profit Realty Co. v. Nelson, 172 A.D. 893, 156 N.Y.S. 1136 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment and decision modified (1) by striking out the provision that plaintiff had a lien for the amount of the expenses incurred in examination of the title, aggregating, with interest, $159.83 (Occidental Realty Co. v. Palmer, 117 App. Div. 505, 510; Ungrich v. Shaff, 119 id. 843, 847; 130 id. 902. See, also, Hugel v. Habel, 132 App. Div. 327, 330); and (2) by striking out the provision that plaintiff recover of the widow and heirs at law of the deceased vendor any sum whatever, except for the purposes of adjudging that the estate of the heirs at law is subject to the vendor’s lien for the money actually paid upon the contract, with interest. (Villone v. Feinstein, 132 App. Div. 31.) As thus modified the [894]*894judgment is affirmed, with costs to the respondent. Ho opinion. Jenks, P. J., Carr, Stapleton, Mills and Rich, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment and decision modified (1) by striking out the provision that plaintiff had a lien for the amount of the expenses incurred in examination of the title, aggregating, with interest, $159.83 (Occidental Realty Co. v. Palmer, 117 App. Div. 505, 510; Ungrich v. Shaff, 119 id. 843, 847; 130 id. 902. See, also, Hugel v. Habel, 132 App. Div. 327, 330); and (2) by striking out the provision that plaintiff recover of the widow and heirs at law of the deceased vendor any sum whatever, except for the purposes of adjudging that the estate of the heirs at law is subject to the vendor’s lien for the money actually paid upon the contract, with interest. (Villone v. Feinstein, 132 App. Div. 31.) As thus modified the [894]*894judgment is affirmed, with costs to the respondent. Ho opinion. Jenks, P. J., Carr, Stapleton, Mills and Rich, JJ., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

172 A.D. 893, 156 N.Y.S. 1136, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mutual-profit-realty-co-v-nelson-nyappdiv-1915.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack