Mutual Life Insurance v. Newell

28 N.Y.S. 913, 85 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 293, 60 N.Y. St. Rep. 241
New York Supreme Court·Decided May 14, 1894·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PRATT, J.

The right of the mortgagee to protect his interest by payment of taxes, which become a superior lien, depends not upon the covenants in the bond or mortgage, but upon the general principles of equity. It follows that the merger of the bond and mortgage in the judgment has no effect upon the right. The general powers of the court are ample to make such corrections in the judgment as the changed conditions render necessary. We observé that a small amount paid by the mortgagee for insurance against fire was allowed at special term. The order appealed from should be modified by striking out the sum allowed for insurance, and, as thus modified, affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mutual Life Insurance v. Newell, 28 N.Y.S. 913, 85 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 293, 60 N.Y. St. Rep. 241 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1894).

28 N.Y.S. 913 (Mutual Life Insurance v. Newell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Leopold v. Epstein
66 N.Y.S. 414 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1900)
Savings & Loan Society v. Burnett
39 P. 922 (California Supreme Court, 1895)