Mutual Life Insurance v. Clancy

36 S.E. 944, 111 Ga. 865, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 852
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedAugust 8, 1900
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 36 S.E. 944 (Mutual Life Insurance v. Clancy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mutual Life Insurance v. Clancy, 36 S.E. 944, 111 Ga. 865, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 852 (Ga. 1900).

Opinion

Fish, J.

1. Where a policy of life insurance expressly stipulated that the premium should be paid annually on or before a specified day, at the home office of the company, or to an agent producing a receipt of the company, signed by its president or secretary, and that if not so paid the policy should then become void, and that none of the terms of the policy could be changed or waived except by written agreement signed by the president or secretary of the company, a failure to pay the premium as stipulated released the company from all liability upon the policy. See Reese v. Fidelity Asso., ante, 482.

2. Where the local agent of the company represented to the holder of such a policy that the company would change it so that the premium would be payable quarterly instead of annually, and the assured thereafter made a written request of the company that it make such change, the mere [866]*866failure of the company to reply to this request was no excuse for not paying the premium in accordance with the terms of the policy.

Argued July 20, — Decided August 8, 1900. Action on insurance policy. Before Judge Nottingham. City court of Macon. November 4, 1899. Dessau, Harris & Birch, for plaintiff in error. M. G. Bayne and T. J. Cochran, contra.

3. The evidence submitted upon the trial demanded a finding in favor of the company, and the court erred in rendering judgment for the plaintiff. Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Life Casualty Ins. Co. of Tenn. v. Jordan
25 S.E.2d 103 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1943)
Sovereign Camp Woodmen of the World v. Cooper
21 S.E.2d 410 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1942)
Illinois Bankers Life Assur. Co. v. Cutlip
1935 OK 858 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1935)
Keesler v. Mutual Benefit Life Insurance
99 S.E. 207 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1919)
Reliance Life Insurance v. Hightower
98 S.E. 469 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1919)
Royal Benefit Society v. Naylor
80 S.E. 545 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1914)
Stephenson v. Empire Life Insurance
76 S.E. 592 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1912)
Johnson v. Ætna Insurance
51 S.E. 339 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1905)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
36 S.E. 944, 111 Ga. 865, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 852, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mutual-life-insurance-v-clancy-ga-1900.