Mutual Life Ins. v. Allen
This text of 97 F. 985 (Mutual Life Ins. v. Allen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an action brought upon two policies of insurance on the life of Samuel B. Stewart:, each for the sum of $2,500. One premium was paid on each policy when delivered. No other premiums were ever paid. The pleadings in this ease, as to forfeiture, are similar to the case of Insurance Co. v. Sears (C. C. A.) 97 Fed. 986. The court sustained a demurrer to the answer, and rendered judgment in favor of defendant in ereor for $5,091, with interest and costs. Upon the legal principles announced in Insurance Co. v. Hill, Id. 263, and authorities there cited, the judgment of the circuit court is affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
97 F. 985, 38 C.C.A. 696, 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 2694, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mutual-life-ins-v-allen-ca9-1899.