Mutual Life Ins. v. Allen

Ninth Circuit

Mutual Life Ins. v. Allen

97 F. 985, 38 C.C.A. 696, 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 2694

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided October 2, 1899·No. No. 519·Published

Opinion

HAWLEY, District Judge.

This is an action brought upon two policies of insurance on the life of Samuel B. Stewart:, each for the sum of $2,500. One premium was paid on each policy when delivered. No other premiums were ever paid. The pleadings in this ease, as to forfeiture, are similar to the case of Insurance Co. v. Sears (C. C. A.) 97 Fed. 986. The court sustained a demurrer to the answer, and rendered judgment in favor of defendant in ereor for $5,091, with interest and costs. Upon the legal principles announced in Insurance Co. v. Hill, Id. 263, and authorities there cited, the judgment of the circuit court is affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HAWLEY, District Judge.

This is an action brought upon two policies of insurance on the life of Samuel B. Stewart:, each for the sum of $2,500. One premium was paid on each policy when delivered. No other premiums were ever paid. The pleadings in this ease, as to forfeiture, are similar to the case of Insurance Co. v. Sears (C. C. A.) 97 Fed. 986. The court sustained a demurrer to the answer, and rendered judgment in favor of defendant in ereor for $5,091, with interest and costs. Upon the legal principles announced in Insurance Co. v. Hill, Id. 263, and authorities there cited, the judgment of the circuit court is affirmed, with costs.

Mutual Life Ins. v. Allen, 97 F. 985, 38 C.C.A. 696, 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 2694 (9th Cir. 1899).

Pincite

97 F. 985 (Mutual Life Ins. v. Allen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related