Mutual Home Dealers Corp. v. Commissioner of Banking & Insurance
259 A.2d 912, 55 N.J. 82, 1969 N.J. LEXIS 153
Opinion
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed by Judge Wick in the Chancery Division, 104 N. J. Super. 25.
For affirmance — Chief Justice Weinteatjb and Justices Jacobs, Feancis, Peootoe, Hail, Schettino and Hane-man — 7.
For reversal — Hone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mutual Home Dealers Corp. v. Commissioner of Banking & Insurance, 259 A.2d 912, 55 N.J. 82, 1969 N.J. LEXIS 153 (N.J. 1969).
259 A.2d 912 (Mutual Home Dealers Corp. v. Commissioner of Banking & Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Abbott v. Burke
495 A.2d 376 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1985)
Garrow v. Elizabeth General Hospital and Dispensary
401 A.2d 533 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1979)
Brunetti v. Borough of New Milford
350 A.2d 19 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1975)
City Consumer Services, Inc. v. Dept. of Banking
342 A.2d 540 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1975)
Harris v. Salem County Planning Bd.
302 A.2d 552 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1973)