Mutual Film Co. v. Industrial Commission of Ohio

236 U.S. 247, 35 S. Ct. 393, 59 L. Ed. 561, 1915 U.S. LEXIS 1756

Opinion

Mr. Justice McKenna

delivered the opinion of the court.

This case, was submitted with. No. 456, just decided. In the latter case the complainant in the court below and appellant here was a corporation of Virginia. The appellant. in the pending case is a corporation of dhio, and counsel say “although there are some differences in the way in which their business is conducted, yet the questions involved are the same, the records in both cases are nearly identical,, and the court below treated them together, rendering the one opinion to cover both.” And counsel have submitted them on the same argument.

On the authority, therefore, of thé opinion in No. 456, the decree is

Affirmed.