Mutual Coal Co. v. Angelo

246 F. 124, 158 C.C.A. 350, 1917 U.S. App. LEXIS 1334
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided September 17, 1917·No. No. 4739·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The assignments of error in this case are directed to the ruling of the trial court on motion for a new trial. The sufficiency of the evidence to justify the verdict is raised in no other manner. It is apparent, therefore, that there is nothing presented to us for review.

The judgment below is affirmed. Motion for damages for delay under the rule denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mutual Coal Co. v. Angelo, 246 F. 124, 158 C.C.A. 350, 1917 U.S. App. LEXIS 1334 (8th Cir. 1917).

246 F. 124 (Mutual Coal Co. v. Angelo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.