Mutual Coal Co. v. Angelo
246 F. 124, 158 C.C.A. 350, 1917 U.S. App. LEXIS 1334
Opinion
The assignments of error in this case are directed to the ruling of the trial court on motion for a new trial. The sufficiency of the evidence to justify the verdict is raised in no other manner. It is apparent, therefore, that there is nothing presented to us for review.
The judgment below is affirmed. Motion for damages for delay under the rule denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mutual Coal Co. v. Angelo, 246 F. 124, 158 C.C.A. 350, 1917 U.S. App. LEXIS 1334 (8th Cir. 1917).
246 F. 124 (Mutual Coal Co. v. Angelo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.