Mutual Benefit, Health & Accident Ass'n v. Bowman

304 U.S. 549, 58 S. Ct. 1056
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided May 31, 1938·No. No. 1004·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted limited to the question of the right of respondent to recover under the law of New Mexico. The judgment of the Circuit Court of Appeals is vacated and the cause is remanded to the Circuit Court of Appeals for determination of thp question presented. Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins, ante, p. 64; New York Life Ins. Co. v. Jackson, ante, p. 261; Rosenthal v. New York Life Ins. Co., ante, p. 263.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mutual Benefit, Health & Accident Ass'n v. Bowman, 304 U.S. 549, 58 S. Ct. 1056 (1938).

304 U.S. 549 (Mutual Benefit, Health & Accident Ass'n v. Bowman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Toole County Irr. Dist. v. Moody
125 F.2d 498 (Ninth Circuit, 1942)
Sampson v. Channell
110 F.2d 754 (First Circuit, 1940)