Mutual Aid & Benefit Ass'n of Forstmanw & Huffmann Employees v. Commissioner
42 F.2d 619, 8 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 11208, 1930 U.S. App. LEXIS 4320, 8 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 11
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided July 21, 1930·No. No. 4372·Published·Cited by 8 cases
Opinion
While the facts of course are different, the principle involved in Bok v. McCaUghn (C. C. A.) 42 F.(2d) 616, is decisive of this [620] case. The order of the Board of Tax Appeals mil therefore be vacated and the ease remanded for further proceedings in accord with this court’s opinion in that case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mutual Aid & Benefit Ass'n of Forstmanw & Huffmann Employees v. Commissioner, 42 F.2d 619, 8 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 11208, 1930 U.S. App. LEXIS 4320, 8 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 11 (3d Cir. 1930).
42 F.2d 619 (Mutual Aid & Benefit Ass'n of Forstmanw & Huffmann Employees v. Commissioner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Watson v. United States
355 F.2d 269 (Third Circuit, 1965)
Carlson v. Commissioner
21 T.C. 291 (U.S. Tax Court, 1953)
Estate of Carlson v. Commissioner
21 T.C. 291 (U.S. Tax Court, 1953)
T. J. Moss Tie Co. v. Commissioner
18 T.C. 188 (U.S. Tax Court, 1952)
Gimbel v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
54 F.2d 780 (Third Circuit, 1931)