Mutters v. White Castle System, Inc.

683 N.E.2d 1095, 79 Ohio St. 3d 420
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided September 24, 1997·No. No. 97-774·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

The discretionary appeal is allowed.

The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the cause is remanded to that court to apply Lewis v. Trimble (1997), 79 Ohio St.3d 231, 680 N.E.2d 1207.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur. Lundberg Stratton, J., concurs separately.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mutters v. White Castle System, Inc., 683 N.E.2d 1095, 79 Ohio St. 3d 420 (Ohio 1997).

683 N.E.2d 1095 (Mutters v. White Castle System, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mutters v. White Castle Sys., Inc.
1997 Ohio 140 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1997)