Mutter v. State
785 So. 2d 670, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 6206, 2001 WL 487320
Opinion
We affirm the circuit court’s summary denial of appellant’s motion to correct sentence, in which he sought relief pursuant to Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla.2000), without prejudice to his filing, pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, a timely,1 sworn motion raising his claim, if indeed he received a guidelines sentence.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mutter v. State, 785 So. 2d 670, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 6206, 2001 WL 487320 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).
785 So. 2d 670 (Mutter v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Jenkins v. State
771 So. 2d 37 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Heggs v. State
759 So. 2d 620 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)