Muttart v. Muttart

93 N.Y.S. 468
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedApril 24, 1905
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 93 N.Y.S. 468 (Muttart v. Muttart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Muttart v. Muttart, 93 N.Y.S. 468 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1905).

Opinion

LEVENTRITT, J.

The appeal, having been taken only from the order sustaining the demurrer, cannot be entertained. Stoddard v. Bell, 100 App. Div. 389, 91 N. Y. Supp. 477. If we could consider it, we should have to hold that the complaint is insufficient. It is defective to sustain in any court an action, as on a New Jersey judgment. Beyond this, however, taking notice, for the pur[469]*469pose of this opinion, that the Court of Chancery of New Jersey is a court of record, it is clear that, under subdivision 6 of section 1 of the Municipal Court act (Laws 1902, p. 1488, c. 580), the court below had no jurisdiction.

Appeal dismissed, with $10 costs. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wiesenberg v. Rosenberg
88 Misc. 91 (New York Supreme Court, 1914)
McManus v. McManus
150 N.Y.S. 87 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1914)
Swing v. Kaufman
115 N.Y.S. 143 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1909)
Howard v. Sattler
107 N.Y.S. 24 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1907)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
93 N.Y.S. 468, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/muttart-v-muttart-nyappterm-1905.