Muttart v. Muttart
This text of 93 N.Y.S. 468 (Muttart v. Muttart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appeal, having been taken only from the order sustaining the demurrer, cannot be entertained. Stoddard v. Bell, 100 App. Div. 389, 91 N. Y. Supp. 477. If we could consider it, we should have to hold that the complaint is insufficient. It is defective to sustain in any court an action, as on a New Jersey judgment. Beyond this, however, taking notice, for the pur[469]*469pose of this opinion, that the Court of Chancery of New Jersey is a court of record, it is clear that, under subdivision 6 of section 1 of the Municipal Court act (Laws 1902, p. 1488, c. 580), the court below had no jurisdiction.
Appeal dismissed, with $10 costs. All concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
93 N.Y.S. 468, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/muttart-v-muttart-nyappterm-1905.