Muth v. Fitzgerald Bros. Brewing Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Muth v. Fitzgerald Bros. Brewing Co.

257 A.D. 897, 12 N.Y.S.2d 489, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8319

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 24, 1939·Published

Opinion

The automobile collision happened at the intersection of Consaul road, Schenectady, a paved east and west street, with Elliott avenue, a north and south street. Defendant-appellant’s truck was proceeding westerly on Consaul road, followed by an automobile driven by the defendant DeForge. Appellant’s driver for the purpose of turning into Elliott avenue stopped suddenly, without notice or signal, and DeForge was forced into the east lane of traffic of Consaul road where his automobile struck and overturned plaintiff's automobile. The evidence sustains the verdicts. Judgments and orders unanimously affirmed, with one bill of costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The automobile collision happened at the intersection of Consaul road, Schenectady, a paved east and west street, with Elliott avenue, a north and south street. Defendant-appellant’s truck was proceeding westerly on Consaul road, followed by an automobile driven by the defendant DeForge. Appellant’s driver for the purpose of turning into Elliott avenue stopped suddenly, without notice or signal, and DeForge was forced into the east lane of traffic of Consaul road where his automobile struck and overturned plaintiff's automobile. The evidence sustains the verdicts. Judgments and orders unanimously affirmed, with one bill of costs.

Muth v. Fitzgerald Bros. Brewing Co., 257 A.D. 897, 12 N.Y.S.2d 489, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8319 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

257 A.D. 897 (Muth v. Fitzgerald Bros. Brewing Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.