Mutch v. Seignious

Sixth Circuit

Mutch v. Seignious

94 F.2d 1018, 1938 U.S. App. LEXIS 4589

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 16, 1938

DocketNo. 7949

StatusPublished

This text of 94 F.2d 1018 (Mutch v. Seignious) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mutch v. Seignious, 94 F.2d 1018, 1938 U.S. App. LEXIS 4589 (6th Cir. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

It appearing to the court that a motion to docket and dismiss appeal has been filed, accompanied by certificate of the clerk of the District Court as provided by rule 18, and it further appearing that appellants have failed to file the record or docket the case by or before the return day, and that there has been no extension of time therefor, on consideration whereof, it is ordered that the appeal be, and the same is, docketed and dismissed.

Appeal docketed and dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

It appearing to the court that a motion to docket and dismiss appeal has been filed, accompanied by certificate of the clerk of the District Court as provided by rule 18, and it further appearing that appellants have failed to file the record or docket the case by or before the return day, and that there has been no extension of time therefor, on consideration whereof, it is ordered that the appeal be, and the same is, docketed and dismissed.

Appeal docketed and dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

94 F.2d 1018, 1938 U.S. App. LEXIS 4589, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mutch-v-seignious-ca6-1938.