Musto v. Bell South Telecommunications Corp.
741 So. 2d 637, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 12728, 1999 WL 767157
Opinion
ON APPELLEES’ MOTION FOR CERTIFICATION
We grant appellees’ motion for certification and certify the following question to be of great public importance:
IN DETERMINING WHEN THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS BEGINS TO RUN ON THE COMMON LAW TORT OF CREDIT SLANDER, SHOULD COURTS APPLY THE “SINGLE PUBLICATION RULE” AT ISSUE IN WAGNER, NUGENT, JOHNSON, ROTH, ROMANO, ERIK-[638]*638SON & KUPFER, P.A. v. FLANAGAN, 629 So.2d 113 (Fla.1993), OR THE “MULTIPLE PUBLICATION RULE?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Musto v. Bell South Telecommunications Corp., 741 So. 2d 637, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 12728, 1999 WL 767157 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).
741 So. 2d 637 (Musto v. Bell South Telecommunications Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
WAGNER, NUGENT, JOHNSON v. Flanagan
629 So. 2d 113 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1993)