Mustin v. Wainwright

District Court, N.D. Ohio·Decided September 21, 2023·No. 3:21-cv-00321·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Keith Mustin, Case No. 3:21-cv-321

Plaintiff,

v. ORDER

Warden Lyneal Wainwright, et al.,

Defendants.

Plaintiff Keith Mustin has filed a motion to proceed on appeal without prepaying the appellate filing fee. (Doc. No. 30). Section 1915 provides “[a]n appeal may not be taken in forma pauperis if the trial court certifies in writing that it is not taken in good faith.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). A court may grant a motion to proceed in forma pauperis if the issues are arguable on their merits, even if the petitioner cannot show a probability of success on the merits. See, e.g., Foster v. Ludwick, 208 F. Supp. 2d 750, 765 (E.D. Mich. 2002). I conclude the issues Bloodworth raises are not frivolous, even if he is unlikely to succeed on appeal, and I grant his motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. (Doc. No. 30).

So Ordered.

s/ Jeffrey J. Helmick United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mustin v. Wainwright, (N.D. Ohio 2023).

Mustin v. Wainwright (Mustin v. Wainwright) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Foster v. Ludwick
208 F. Supp. 2d 750 (E.D. Michigan, 2002)