Mustin v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Mustin v. State

120 So. 918, 23 Ala. App. 77, 1929 Ala. App. LEXIS 65

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 26, 1929

Docket6 Div. 399.

StatusPublished

This text of 120 So. 918 (Mustin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mustin v. State, 120 So. 918, 23 Ala. App. 77, 1929 Ala. App. LEXIS 65 (Ala. Ct. App. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

Where an appeal to this court is upon the record only, the regularity of the proceedings in such record is the only question presented. In the absence of a bill of exceptions, the refusal of written charges to appellant will not be considered. In this case the appellant was convicted of the offense of unlawfully possessing a still, etc., to be used for the purpose of manufacturing prohibited liquors or beverages. He was duly sentenced to serve an indeterminate term of imprisonment in the penitentiary. The appeal is upon the record, there being no bill of exceptions. As the record is without error, the judgment of conviction in the lower court will stand affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICKEN, P. J.

Where an appeal to this court is upon the record only, the regularity of the proceedings in such record is the only question presented. In the absence of a bill of exceptions, the refusal of written charges to appellant will not be considered. In this case the appellant was convicted of the offense of unlawfully possessing a still, etc., to be used for the purpose of manufacturing prohibited liquors or beverages. He was duly sentenced to serve an indeterminate term of imprisonment in the penitentiary. The appeal is upon the record, there being no bill of exceptions. As the record is without error, the judgment of conviction in the lower court will stand affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

120 So. 918, 23 Ala. App. 77, 1929 Ala. App. LEXIS 65, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mustin-v-state-alactapp-1929.