Mustang Riders, Inc. v. Dutchman Tree Farms, Llc

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedSeptember 28, 2006
Docket13-06-00446-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Mustang Riders, Inc. v. Dutchman Tree Farms, Llc (Mustang Riders, Inc. v. Dutchman Tree Farms, Llc) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mustang Riders, Inc. v. Dutchman Tree Farms, Llc, (Tex. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion



NUMBER 13-06-446-CV


COURT OF APPEALS


THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS


CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

________________________________________________________


MUSTANG RIDERS, INC., ET AL.,                                           Appellants,


v.


DUTCHMAN TREE FARMS, LLC,                                                Appellee.


On appeal from the 214th District Court

of Nueces County, Texas


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Yañez and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam


          Appellants, MUSTANG RIDERS, INC., ET AL., attempted to perfect an appeal from a judgment entered by the 214th District Court of Nueces County, Texas, in cause number 05-2391-F. Judgment in this cause was signed on May 4, 2006. A timely motion for new trial was filed on June 5, 2006. Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 26.1, appellants’ notice of appeal was due on August 2, 2006, but was not filed until August 9, 2006.

          Notice of this defect was given so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. Appellants were advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this Court’s letter, the appeal would be dismissed. To date, no response has been received from appellants.

          The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, appellants’ failure to timely perfect their appeal, and appellants’ failure to respond to this Court’s notice, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

                                                                                                 PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed

this the 28th day of September, 2006.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Mustang Riders, Inc. v. Dutchman Tree Farms, Llc, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mustang-riders-inc-v-dutchman-tree-farms-llc-texapp-2006.