Mustafa v. PennyMac Corp. ex rel. PennyMac Loan Services
This text of 696 F. App'x 638 (Mustafa v. PennyMac Corp. ex rel. PennyMac Loan Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
In these consolidated appeals, Fatima and Kamal Mustafa appeal from the district court’s orders affirming two orders of the bankruptcy court granting the Appel-lees’ motion for relief from the automatic stay in order to proceed with post-foreclosure sale actions. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Mustafa v. Penny-Mac Corp., No. 8:16-cv-00494-PJM.; Mustafa v. PMT NPL Financing, No. 8:16-cv-00523-PJM (D. Md. Filed Mar. 29, 2017, and entered Mar. 30, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the material before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
696 F. App'x 638, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mustafa-v-pennymac-corp-ex-rel-pennymac-loan-services-ca4-2017.