Mustafa Nadaf D/B/A Discount Mini Mart v. Texas Commission on Environmental Quality

Court of Appeals of Texas

Mustafa Nadaf D/B/A Discount Mini Mart v. Texas Commission on Environmental Quality

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided October 2, 2013·No. 04-13-00068-CV·Published

Opinion

Jfourtl) Court of $s>n\\ 3ntomo,

October 2. 2013

No. 04-13-00068-CV

Mustafa Nadafd/b/a Discount Mini Man, Appellant

v.

Texas Commission on Environmental Quality and Gregg Abbott, Attorney General for the Slalc of Texas. Appellees

Trial Court Case No. D-l-GN09-002367

ORDER

The Court has reviewed the record and briefs in this appeal and the majority of the judges have determined that oral argument will not significantly aid it in determining the legal and factual issues presented in the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 39.8. Therefore, all requests for oral argument arc denied, and the cause is advanced for ON HUIETS submission on November 12. 2013. to the following panel: Justice Marion. Justice Martinez, and Justice Chapa. .All parties will be notified of the Court's decision in this appeal in accordance with TEX. R. App. I1. 48.

Either party may llle a motion requesting the Court to reconsider its determination thai oral argument will not significantly aid the Court in determining the legal ami factual issues presented in the appeal. See TEX. R. App. I1. 39.S. Such a motion should be filed within ten (10) days from the date of this order.

It is so ORDERED on October 2. 2013.

Sandee Bryan Maflon, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and ;i/fixcd the seal o/the said court on this October 2. 201 3.

ItilWlfl. I ■'-'

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jfourtl) Court of $s>n\\ 3ntomo,

October 2. 2013

No. 04-13-00068-CV

Mustafa Nadafd/b/a Discount Mini Man, Appellant

v.

Texas Commission on Environmental Quality and Gregg Abbott, Attorney General for the Slalc of Texas. Appellees

Trial Court Case No. D-l-GN09-002367

ORDER

The Court has reviewed the record and briefs in this appeal and the majority of the judges have determined that oral argument will not significantly aid it in determining the legal and factual issues presented in the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 39.8. Therefore, all requests for oral argument arc denied, and the cause is advanced for ON HUIETS submission on November 12. 2013. to the following panel: Justice Marion. Justice Martinez, and Justice Chapa. .All parties will be notified of the Court's decision in this appeal in accordance with TEX. R. App. I1. 48.

Either party may llle a motion requesting the Court to reconsider its determination thai oral argument will not significantly aid the Court in determining the legal ami factual issues presented in the appeal. See TEX. R. App. I1. 39.S. Such a motion should be filed within ten (10) days from the date of this order.

It is so ORDERED on October 2. 2013.

Sandee Bryan Maflon, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and ;i/fixcd the seal o/the said court on this October 2. 201 3.

ItilWlfl. I ■'-'

Mustafa Nadaf D/B/A Discount Mini Mart v. Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Mustafa Nadaf D/B/A Discount Mini Mart v. Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (Mustafa Nadaf D/B/A Discount Mini Mart v. Texas Commission on Environmental Quality) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.