Mustafa Ansari v. Federal National Mortgage Association

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 11, 2016
DocketA16D0166
StatusPublished

This text of Mustafa Ansari v. Federal National Mortgage Association (Mustafa Ansari v. Federal National Mortgage Association) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mustafa Ansari v. Federal National Mortgage Association, (Ga. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ December 28, 2015

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A16D0166. MUSTAFA ANSARI v. FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION et al.

This case began as a dispossessory proceeding in magistrate court. Following an adverse ruling, defendant Mustafa Ansari1 appealed to the superior court, which entered a final judgment and writ of possession in favor of the plaintiff in February 2015. Ansari then filed an “Emergency Petition for Writ of Mandamus, Prohibition, Request for Stay, Declaratory and Injunctive Relief,” which the superior court denied by order entered October 20, 2015. On October 28, 2015, Ansari filed an application for discretionary appeal from this ruling in the Supreme Court, which construed Ansari’s “Emergency Petition” as a motion to set aside a writ of possession and transferred the case to this Court.2 We lack jurisdiction. An application for discretionary appeal generally may be filed within 30 days of entry of the order sought to be appealed. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (d). The underlying subject matter of an appeal, however, controls over the relief sought in determining the proper appellate procedure. See Rebich v. Miles, 264 Ga. 467, 467-468 (448 SE2d 192) (1994). The underlying subject matter here is a dispossessory judgment.

1 Ansari’s last name also is spelled “Anasari” in the record. 2 Although Ansari’s application also is entitled “Emergency Petition for Writ of Mandamus, Prohibition[,] Request for Stay, Declaratory and Injunctive Relief,” he essentially seeks appellate review of the superior court’s order denying the similarly styled “Emergency Petition” he filed in that court. See Kuriatnyk v. Kuriatnyk, 286 Ga. 589, 590 (690 SE2d 397) (2010) (in construing pleadings, substance controls over nomenclature). Under OCGA § 44-7-56, an appeal from a dispossessory judgment must be filed within seven days of the date the judgment was entered. See Ray M. Wright, Inc. v. Jones, 239 Ga. App. 521, 522-523 (521 SE2d 456) (1999). Ansari’s October 28 application is untimely, as it was filed eight days after the superior court’s order denying his “Emergency Petition,” and more than eight months after the court’s February 2015 final judgment. Accordingly, we lack jurisdiction to review this application, which is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia 12/28/2015 Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ray M. Wright, Inc. v. Jones
521 S.E.2d 456 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1999)
Rebich v. Miles
448 S.E.2d 192 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1994)
Kuriatnyk v. Kuriatnyk
690 S.E.2d 397 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Mustafa Ansari v. Federal National Mortgage Association, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mustafa-ansari-v-federal-national-mortgage-association-gactapp-2016.