Mustafa Ali Mohamed v. Frye
This text of 51 F. App'x 480 (Mustafa Ali Mohamed v. Frye) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Hakeem Mustafa Ali Mohamed appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(l) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Mohamed v. Frye, No. CA-02-682-2 (E.D. Va. filed Sept. 5, 2002; entered Sept. 6, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
51 F. App'x 480, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mustafa-ali-mohamed-v-frye-ca4-2002.