Mussoline v. Tax Claim Bureau
This text of 188 A.2d 740 (Mussoline v. Tax Claim Bureau) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
Appellant entered into a mining lease with appellee for the period of one year commencing October 11, 1960. The lease contained a provision (a) giving appellant an option for renewal, and (b) giving appellee an option for termination of the lease at the end of *188 the year. Appellant was evicted before the expiration of the year for reasons which on this record appear insufficient. Appellant filed a complaint in equity (1) for the specific performance of the lease for the year in question, and (2) for damages. That year has long since passed, and consequently specific performance could not now be granted. The Court below correctly sustained preliminary objections on the ground that appellant had an adequate remedy at law.
The appeal is dismissed, without prejudice to plaintiff’s right to bring an appropriate action at law against the defendants. Each party to pay own costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
188 A.2d 740, 410 Pa. 187, 1963 Pa. LEXIS 585, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mussoline-v-tax-claim-bureau-pa-1963.