Mussoline v. Tax Claim Bureau

188 A.2d 740, 410 Pa. 187, 1963 Pa. LEXIS 585
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMarch 19, 1963
DocketAppeal, 31
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 188 A.2d 740 (Mussoline v. Tax Claim Bureau) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mussoline v. Tax Claim Bureau, 188 A.2d 740, 410 Pa. 187, 1963 Pa. LEXIS 585 (Pa. 1963).

Opinion

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Bell,

Appellant entered into a mining lease with appellee for the period of one year commencing October 11, 1960. The lease contained a provision (a) giving appellant an option for renewal, and (b) giving appellee an option for termination of the lease at the end of *188 the year. Appellant was evicted before the expiration of the year for reasons which on this record appear insufficient. Appellant filed a complaint in equity (1) for the specific performance of the lease for the year in question, and (2) for damages. That year has long since passed, and consequently specific performance could not now be granted. The Court below correctly sustained preliminary objections on the ground that appellant had an adequate remedy at law.

The appeal is dismissed, without prejudice to plaintiff’s right to bring an appropriate action at law against the defendants. Each party to pay own costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Redevelopment Authority v. Gallagher
370 A.2d 395 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
188 A.2d 740, 410 Pa. 187, 1963 Pa. LEXIS 585, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mussoline-v-tax-claim-bureau-pa-1963.