Mussoline v. Tax Claim Bureau

188 A.2d 740, 410 Pa. 187, 1963 Pa. LEXIS 585
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided March 19, 1963·No. Appeal, 31·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Bell,

Appellant entered into a mining lease with appellee for the period of one year commencing October 11, 1960. The lease contained a provision (a) giving appellant an option for renewal, and (b) giving appellee an option for termination of the lease at the end of *188 the year. Appellant was evicted before the expiration of the year for reasons which on this record appear insufficient. Appellant filed a complaint in equity (1) for the specific performance of the lease for the year in question, and (2) for damages. That year has long since passed, and consequently specific performance could not now be granted. The Court below correctly sustained preliminary objections on the ground that appellant had an adequate remedy at law.

The appeal is dismissed, without prejudice to plaintiff’s right to bring an appropriate action at law against the defendants. Each party to pay own costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mussoline v. Tax Claim Bureau, 188 A.2d 740, 410 Pa. 187, 1963 Pa. LEXIS 585 (Pa. 1963).

188 A.2d 740 (Mussoline v. Tax Claim Bureau) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Redevelopment Authority v. Gallagher
370 A.2d 395 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1977)