Musso v. Piccadilly Cafeterias, Inc.
179 So. 2d 641, 248 La. 468, 1965 La. LEXIS 2252
Opinion
In re: Raymond S. Musso et ux. applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge, 178 So.2d 421.
The application is denied. There appears no error of law in the judgment complained of.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Musso v. Piccadilly Cafeterias, Inc., 179 So. 2d 641, 248 La. 468, 1965 La. LEXIS 2252 (La. 1965).
179 So. 2d 641 (Musso v. Piccadilly Cafeterias, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cain v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc.
757 So. 2d 712 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1999)
Clime v. Dewey Beach Enterprises, Inc.
831 F. Supp. 341 (D. Delaware, 1993)
Goodman v. Wenco Foods, Inc.
423 S.E.2d 444 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1992)
Simeon v. Doe
602 So. 2d 77 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1992)
Johnson v. South Pacific Canning Co.
580 So. 2d 556 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1991)
Riviere v. JC Penney Co., Inc.
478 So. 2d 965 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1985)
Title v. Pontchartrain Hotel
449 So. 2d 677 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1984)