Musselman v. Department of the Army
868 F.3d 1341, 2017 WL 3081819, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 13055
This text of 868 F.3d 1341 (Musselman v. Department of the Army) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Musselman v. Department of the Army, 868 F.3d 1341, 2017 WL 3081819, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 13055 (Fed. Cir. 2017).
Opinions
with whom NEWMAN and O’MALLEY, Circuit Judges, join, dissent from the denial of the petition for hearing en banc for the reasons stated in the dissent from denial of the petition for rehearing en banc in Fedora v. Merit Systems Protection Board, No. 15-3039.
STOLL, Circuit Judge, dissents without opinion from the denial of the petition for hearing en banc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
868 F.3d 1341, 2017 WL 3081819, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 13055, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/musselman-v-department-of-the-army-cafc-2017.