Mussellman v. Bank of Williamstown

Sixth Circuit

Mussellman v. Bank of Williamstown

99 F.2d 1009, 1938 U.S. App. LEXIS 3077

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedOctober 14, 1938

DocketNo. 7514

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 99 F.2d 1009 (Mussellman v. Bank of Williamstown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mussellman v. Bank of Williamstown, 99 F.2d 1009, 1938 U.S. App. LEXIS 3077 (6th Cir. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In an appeal, 25 F.Supp. 249, from an order dismissing a farmer debtor’s petition filed under § 75 (s) of the Bankruptcy Act, as amended, the Frazier-Lemke Act, 11 U. S.C.A. § 203 (s), on the ground that it presents no feasible plan for the equitable adjustment of the amounts owing to creditors, and it being the conclusion of the court that there was no abuse of discretion in the entry of the order, it is hereby affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In an appeal, 25 F.Supp. 249, from an order dismissing a farmer debtor’s petition filed under § 75 (s) of the Bankruptcy Act, as amended, the Frazier-Lemke Act, 11 U. S.C.A. § 203 (s), on the ground that it presents no feasible plan for the equitable adjustment of the amounts owing to creditors, and it being the conclusion of the court that there was no abuse of discretion in the entry of the order, it is hereby affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

99 F.2d 1009, 1938 U.S. App. LEXIS 3077, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mussellman-v-bank-of-williamstown-ca6-1938.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack