Home/Supreme Court of North Carolina/Mussallam v. Mussallam

Mussallam v. Mussallam

367 S.E.2d 915, 322 N.C. 116
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Mussallam v. Mussallam. Read the opinion of the Court — 321 N.C. 504 →
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided April 6, 1988·No. 702PA86·Published

Opinion

367 S.E.2d 915 (1988)
322 N.C. 116

Hussein Sayyed MUSSALLAM (Mustafa)
v.
Eeva Hannelle MUSSALLAM.

No. 702PA86.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 6, 1988.

Douglas, Ravenel, Hardy, Crihfield & Lung, Greensboro, for Guilford County Bd. of Educ.

Hatfield & Hatfield, Greensboro, for surety-appellees.

Smith, Patterson, Follin, Curtis, James & Harkavy, Greensboro, for defendant-appellee.

Manlin M. Chee, Greensboro, for defendant-appellee.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant in this matter for rehearing of the decision of this Court pursuant to Rule 31, N.C. Rules of Appellate Procedure, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of April 1988."

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mussallam v. Mussallam, 367 S.E.2d 915, 322 N.C. 116 (N.C. 1988).

367 S.E.2d 915 (Mussallam v. Mussallam) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

N.C. Baptist Hospitals, Inc. v. Mitchell
367 S.E.2d 915 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1988)