Muss v. City of New York

194 A.D.2d 303, 598 N.Y.S.2d 226

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles E. Ramos, J.), entered December 19, 1991, which, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to annul respondents’ determination rejecting petitioner’s request for payment of overtime work in 1987-1988 and corresponding pension benefits, granted respondents’ motion to dismiss the petition as barred by the Statute of Limitations, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Respondents’ determination had " 'its impact’ ” upon petitioner, in October 1990, when respondent New York City Commission on Human Rights informed petitioner that her claim for overtime work in 1987-1988 had been denied (Matter of Edmead v McGuire, 67 NY2d 714, 716). Since this proceeding was not commenced within four months thereafter, it was properly dismissed as time-barred (CPLR 217). Concur—Carro, J. P., Ellerin, Wallach, Ross and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Muss v. City of New York, 194 A.D.2d 303, 598 N.Y.S.2d 226 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

194 A.D.2d 303 (Muss v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Edmead v. McGuire
490 N.E.2d 853 (New York Court of Appeals, 1986)