Muslow v. Warmsley

157 So. 154
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedNovember 2, 1934
DocketNo. 4824.
StatusPublished

This text of 157 So. 154 (Muslow v. Warmsley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Muslow v. Warmsley, 157 So. 154 (La. Ct. App. 1934).

Opinion

DREW, Judge.

This case was consolidated for trial with case No. 4822, entitled John M. Sentell v. W. A. Warmsley, 157 So. 152, this day decided by this court. The only differences in the pleadings are that the plaintiff is different, the description of the land owned by plaintiff is different, and the number of trees cut and the number of ties manufactured is different. In all other respects the petition and answer are the same.

This case was tried upon the same evidence as ease No. 4822, and the lower court awarded judgment for plaintiff in the sum of $18.30, finding that 366 cross-ties were manufactured, from timber on plaintiff’s land, by Buddy Young, who sold them to the defendant. The lower court allowed the stumpage value of 5 cents per tie.

The issues and evidence being the same as in case No. 4822, and the lower court having ■correctly determined the number of ties manufactured from timber on plaintiff’s land, it is therefore decreed, for the reasons assigned in ■ case No. 4822, this day decided by us, that the judgment .of the lower court is affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sentell v. Warmsley
157 So. 152 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1934)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
157 So. 154, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/muslow-v-warmsley-lactapp-1934.