Musleve v. Musleve

919 N.E.2d 218, 124 Ohio St. 3d 1420
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided January 5, 2010·No. 2009-2234·Published

Opinion

Stark App. No. 2009CA00014, 2009-Ohio-5789. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and claimed appeal of right. Upon consideration of appellant’s motion for redaction,

It is ordered by the court that the motion is granted, and appellant shall come to the Supreme Court of Ohio Clerk’s office and redact all personal identifiers, as defined by Rule 44(H) of the Rules of Superintendence for the Courts of Ohio, in this case within ten days of the date of this entry.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Musleve v. Musleve, 919 N.E.2d 218, 124 Ohio St. 3d 1420 (Ohio 2010).

919 N.E.2d 218 (Musleve v. Musleve) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.