Musleva v. Patton Clay Manufacturing Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Musleva v. Patton Clay Manufacturing Co.

12 A.2d 558, 338 Pa. 256, 1940 Pa. LEXIS 502

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMarch 26, 1940

Docket2; Appeal, 167

StatusPublished

This text of 12 A.2d 558 (Musleva v. Patton Clay Manufacturing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Musleva v. Patton Clay Manufacturing Co., 12 A.2d 558, 338 Pa. 256, 1940 Pa. LEXIS 502 (Pa. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Maxey,

This appeal is by the wife of Steve Musleva, the opinion in whose case has this day been handed down. Her action for damages for personal injuries from gases emanating from the mine is based On precisely the same cause of action as her husband’s. For the reasons stated in the opinion in that case, the assignments of error in this case are overruled.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Maxey,

This appeal is by the wife of Steve Musleva, the opinion in whose case has this day been handed down. Her action for damages for personal injuries from gases emanating from the mine is based On precisely the same cause of action as her husband’s. For the reasons stated in the opinion in that case, the assignments of error in this case are overruled.

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

12 A.2d 558, 338 Pa. 256, 1940 Pa. LEXIS 502, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/musleva-v-patton-clay-manufacturing-co-pa-1940.